Anambra Govt Disputes Obi’s ₦2.13bn Ecological Fund Claim

By: Blessing Fali

The Anambra State Government has refuted claims by former Governor Peter Obi that he left ₦2.13 billion in the state’s ecological fund account at the end of his tenure. The government described Obi’s statement as misleading, insisting that records show otherwise.

In a press briefing, officials from the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning explained that while Obi did receive ecological funds during his administration, the amounts were disbursed for specific projects and interventions. They maintained that no such balance was left untouched in the state’s coffers.

“The assertion that ₦2.13 billion was left in the ecological fund account is inaccurate. Funds received during that period were applied to approved ecological projects across the state. There was no surplus of that magnitude at the time of transition,” a government spokesperson said.

The dispute comes amid renewed scrutiny of Obi’s stewardship as governor, with political opponents questioning his financial legacy. Obi, however, has consistently maintained that he left behind significant savings and investments for Anambra, including funds in various accounts and assets.

Analysts note that the controversy reflects broader tensions in Nigerian politics, where claims about financial management often become focal points in debates over credibility and governance. Supporters of Obi argue that his reputation for prudent financial management remains intact, while critics insist that his claims should be verified against official records.

The Anambra government emphasized that transparency remains a priority, assuring citizens that all financial records are available for audit and public scrutiny. Officials urged the public not to be misled by political narratives, stressing that the state’s finances are managed in line with constitutional provisions and oversight mechanisms.

Observers believe the dispute may intensify as Nigeria approaches the 2027 elections, with Obi’s political profile continuing to attract attention. The ecological fund claim adds to ongoing debates about accountability, governance, and the legacies of past leaders.